Delegation Report - marin

Governance Delegation
21

gm everyone :sun_with_face:
I’m very proud & happy to announce I am now part of the MGG program :slight_smile:
That’s a new journey for Moonbeam Governance, with new players and potentially a lot more proposals. I’m really looking forward to it!!

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 79
  • Proposal title: #79 [Proposal: 79] Return PINK and NCTR from Failed TX
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:

Aye. Users shouldn’t lose funds because of misconfigured transfers.

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 80
  • Proposal title: #80 Recover a user’s Manta tokens from contract address
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:

Aye. Even if the user might make a mistake contrary to #79, we have the technical opportunity to help him. Let’s do it :slight_smile:

22

Aye

  • Reason:

I decided to support historical members of the Treasury committee because I’m happy with their previous work.
@dev0_sik + @_yrn + @micheleicebergnodes were the ones I chose & get elected after. I’m sure they’ll do a great work for this season.

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 88
  • Proposal title: #88 Register Bifrost Liquid Staking Token (LST) xcvBNC on Moonbeam
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:

Aye: I like the LST narrative, Bifrost is a great chain and I love the synergies between them and Moonbeam.

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 89
  • Proposal title: #89 Bump XCM Safe Version to 3
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:

Aye. XCM v3 is bringing a lot of good stuff to our chain.

2 Likes
23

gm everyone :sun_with_face:

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 90
  • Proposal title: #90 Direct 80% of PBR Inflation to Treasury on Moonbeam
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:

Aye! This vote is following Gauntlet recommendations that can be found here.. I believe this is a good move as it will allow the Treasury to receive more tokens to fund the ecosystem’s activities continuously. Also, more importantly, this is the first step before increasing the percentage of fees burned from 80% to 100%.

24

gm everyone :sun_with_face:

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 91
  • Proposal title: #91 Authorize Upgrade of Moonbeam to RT3400
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:

Aye! Always in favor of RT upgrade.
What I like the most about RT3400 is the decrease of minimum gas price. The second interesting one is foreign assets are now being registered as EVM natives.

2 Likes
25

gm everyone :sun_with_face:

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 92
  • Proposal title: #92 Dwellir Q1 2025 RPC Services
  • Your votes:

Nay

  • Reason:

Nay because of the wrong track. This proposal had now been canceled.

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 94
  • Proposal title: #94 [DO NOT VOTE] Register Asset xcEURC.s (bridged Circle’s EURC) from Pendulum Chain
  • Your votes:

Nay

  • Reason:

Nay: no decision deposit. Will time out.

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 95
  • Proposal title: #95 [Proposal: 95] Recover Locked PINK Tokens
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:

Aye, this is a beautiful example on how governance can solve technical issues and help users. Love it!

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 96
  • Proposal title: #96 Authorize Upgrade for Moonbeam to RT3401
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:

Aye, always in favor of RT upgrade. This one especially is applying a hot fix to the treasury flow.

2 Likes
26

gm everyone :sun_with_face:

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 97
  • Proposal title: #97 LAOS Proposal Open/Accept HRMP channel and Register Asset xcLAOS
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Aye, always in favor of more HRMP channels with legit projects.
  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 98
  • Proposal title: #98 Register Asset xcEURC.s (bridged Circle’s EURC) from Pendulum Chain
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Aye, I think a more diverse offer of stablecoins benefits our chain, especially when it’s backed by Circle.
1 Like
27
  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 100
  • Proposal title: #100 Batch proposal to close channels between Moonbeam and Polkadex
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Aye, closing non-functional channels is as important as opening new ones. I don’t think there are much activities between both chains at the moment so I’m in favor of this.
  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 101
  • Proposal title: #101 Burn 100% of Transaction Fees on Moonbeam
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Aye, I was very excited by this idea when I discovered it in Gauntlet recommendations. I’m really happy to follow this path. I would add that being able to modify such important parameters of the protocol via an on-chain vote is extremely satisfying. Big aye!
28
  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 101
  • Proposal title: #101 Burn 100% of Transaction Fees on Moonbeam
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Aye, this is a very good proposal, potentially making Moonbeam deflationary.
  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 102
  • Proposal title: #102 Authorize Upgrade for Moonbeam to RT3501
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Aye, always in favor of RT upgrades.
  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 103
  • Proposal title: #103 Proposal: Evolution of the Community Grant Program
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Aye, even if it means I’m losing my seat at the Grant Committee with this update, I believe that’s the right direction.
  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 104
  • Proposal title: #104 InvArch Proposal Open/Accept HRMP channel and Register Asset xcVARCH
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Aye, InvArch is a serious project that has been building on DOT for a long time. I’m happy that I’ll lead to a pool creation on StellaSwap.
  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 105
  • Proposal title: #105 Reducing Moonbeam self bond to 500k GLMR
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Aye, this will make the onboarding of new collators easier.
  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 106
  • Proposal title: #106 Proposal: Grant 2,062,500 GLMR to Moonwell
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Aye, Moonwell is potentially the best project that emerged on Moonbeam. I trust Gauntlet analysis about efficiency on this one.
1 Like
29

gm everyone :sun_with_face:

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 107
  • Proposal title: #107 Authorize Upgrade for Moonbeam to RT3600
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Aye, I’m always in favor of Runtime Upgrades. Notable add here is the reducing Moonbeam self-bond to 500k GLMR
  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 108
  • Proposal title: #108 Proposal to Register Snowbridge Asset ETH, USDC, USDT & DAI
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Aye, this is very exciting. It’ll bring native ETH assets to our chain, and allow deFi projects to create & incentive pools with wrapped/native assets. Looking forward to it!
2 Likes
30

gm everyone :sun_with_face:

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 109
  • Proposal title: #109 Proposal for migrating all substrate based assets to EVM foreign assets on Moonbeam
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Aye, I like this idea a lot. As I mentioned in a recent X thread, this technical evolution aligns with the perfect EVM-compatibility that Moonbeam is pursuing.
  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 110
  • Proposal title: #110 Whitelisted Authorize Upgrade to RT3601 on Moonbeam
  • Your votes:

Aye

  • Reason:
    Obvious aye. A critical bug had been identified in the Polkadot-SDK by the Bittensor’s team. As a MGG delegate, I have to vote as fast as possible to update the chain in case of events like this one.
2 Likes