gm everyone
I’m very proud & happy to announce I am now part of the MGG program
That’s a new journey for Moonbeam Governance, with new players and potentially a lot more proposals. I’m really looking forward to it!!
Network: Moonbeam
Referendum ID: 79
Proposal title:#79 [Proposal: 79] Return PINK and NCTR from Failed TX
Your votes:
Aye
Reason:
Aye. Users shouldn’t lose funds because of misconfigured transfers.
Network: Moonbeam
Referendum ID: 80
Proposal title:#80 Recover a user’s Manta tokens from contract address
Your votes:
Aye
Reason:
Aye. Even if the user might make a mistake contrary to #79, we have the technical opportunity to help him. Let’s do it
I decided to support historical members of the Treasury committee because I’m happy with their previous work. @dev0_sik + @_yrn + @micheleicebergnodes were the ones I chose & get elected after. I’m sure they’ll do a great work for this season.
Proposal title:#90 Direct 80% of PBR Inflation to Treasury on Moonbeam
Your votes:
Aye
Reason:
Aye! This vote is following Gauntlet recommendations that can be found here.. I believe this is a good move as it will allow the Treasury to receive more tokens to fund the ecosystem’s activities continuously. Also, more importantly, this is the first step before increasing the percentage of fees burned from 80% to 100%.
Proposal title: #91 Authorize Upgrade of Moonbeam to RT3400
Your votes:
Aye
Reason:
Aye! Always in favor of RT upgrade.
What I like the most about RT3400 is the decrease of minimum gas price. The second interesting one is foreign assets are now being registered as EVM natives.
Proposal title: #100 Batch proposal to close channels between Moonbeam and Polkadex
Your votes:
Aye
Reason:
Aye, closing non-functional channels is as important as opening new ones. I don’t think there are much activities between both chains at the moment so I’m in favor of this.
Network: Moonbeam
Referendum ID: 101
Proposal title: #101 Burn 100% of Transaction Fees on Moonbeam
Your votes:
Aye
Reason:
Aye, I was very excited by this idea when I discovered it in Gauntlet recommendations. I’m really happy to follow this path. I would add that being able to modify such important parameters of the protocol via an on-chain vote is extremely satisfying. Big aye!
Proposal title: #107 Authorize Upgrade for Moonbeam to RT3600
Your votes:
Aye
Reason:
Aye, I’m always in favor of Runtime Upgrades. Notable add here is the reducing Moonbeam self-bond to 500k GLMR
Network: Moonbeam
Referendum ID: 108
Proposal title: #108 Proposal to Register Snowbridge Asset ETH, USDC, USDT & DAI
Your votes:
Aye
Reason:
Aye, this is very exciting. It’ll bring native ETH assets to our chain, and allow deFi projects to create & incentive pools with wrapped/native assets. Looking forward to it!
Proposal title: #109 Proposal for migrating all substrate based assets to EVM foreign assets on Moonbeam
Your votes:
Aye
Reason:
Aye, I like this idea a lot. As I mentioned in a recent X thread, this technical evolution aligns with the perfect EVM-compatibility that Moonbeam is pursuing.
Network: Moonbeam
Referendum ID: 110
Proposal title: #110 Whitelisted Authorize Upgrade to RT3601 on Moonbeam
Your votes:
Aye
Reason:
Obvious aye. A critical bug had been identified in the Polkadot-SDK by the Bittensor’s team. As a MGG delegate, I have to vote as fast as possible to update the chain in case of events like this one.