[Proposal: 14] OriginTrail Parachain Proposal Open/Accept HRMP channel and Register Asset xcOTP

Title: OriginTrail Parachain Proposal Open/Accept HRMP channel and Register Asset xcOTP

[OriginTrail Parachain] XCM Disclosures

TL:DR

This batched proposal is to Accept/Open an HRMP channel with OriginTrail Parachain and Register Asset xcOTP.

Summary

We propose to open a bi-directional channel between Moonbeam and OriginTrail Parachain. Initially, the main use case will be to transfer OTP between the two chains, but it can be further expanded to other use cases. The proposal also includes the OTP asset registration as xcOTP, with the following details:

  • Multilocation: {“parents”:1,“interior”:{“X1”:{“Parachain”:2043}}}
  • Decimals: 12
  • Name: OriginTrail Parachain Token
  • Symbol: xcOTP

xcOTP will have the following asset ID and XC-20 address:

  • Asset ID: 132111472138656038406190173677435574472
  • XC-20 address: 0xffffffff6363be7805a7c03f5fb2957bdd8558c8

On-Chain Proposal Reference

On-Chain Proposal #[TBD] with the associated hash: TBD

Technical details:

The procedure for opening the channels is as follows:

  • OriginTrail Parachain will propose to open an HRMP channel to Moonbeam
  • Moonbeam: democracy batched proposal:
    • Accept HRMP channel from OriginTrail Parachain to Moonbeam
    • Open Moonbeam to OriginTrail Parachain HRMP channel
    • Register OTP asset as an XC-20
  • OriginTrail Parachain: democracy proposal to accept Moonbeam to OriginTrail Parachain HRMP channel

Once the HRMP channels are ready, XCM based cross-chain transfer will be possible. The extrinsics that need to be executed on the relay chain, are:

  • To accept the HRMP channel to Moonbeam: hrmp.hrmpAcceptOpenChannel(sender: 2043), which hex-encoded call data is TBD
  • To open the HRMP channel from Moonbeam: hrmp.hrmpInitOpenChannel(recipient: 2043, proposedMaxCapacity: 1000, proposedMaxMessageSize: 102400), which its hex-encoded call data is TBD

The *proposedMaxCapacity *and proposedMaxMessageSize are set to the values of Polkadot configuration.activeConfig.hrmpChannelMaxCapacity and configuration.activeConfig.hrmpChannelMaxMessageSize values, respectively.

These extrinsics need to be called from the parachain’s sovereign account as origin, via a democracy proposal. The proposal will use polkadotXcm pallet to send XCM message to the Relay Chain with the following items:

  • Withdraw asset: take funds out of the Sovereign Account of the origin parachain (in the relay chain) to a holding state
  • Buy execution: buys execution time from the relay chain, to execute the XCM message
  • Transact: provides the call data to be executed
  • Deposit asset (optional): refunds the leftover funds after the execution. If this is not provided, no refunds will be carried out

The asset will be registered with the metadata described in the summary. The setAssetUnitsPerSecond is 447142602271573.

If you are interested, the hex-encoded call data for this proposal in Moonbeam is:

TBD

As a prerequisite, the parachain’s sovereign account must contain at least 20 DOT to be locked as collateral (10 for each channel direction), plus some DOT to pay for XCM execution fees.

9 Likes

Will vote Aye and support this. OriginTrail x Moonbeam channel is needed and this is a continuation of the XC vision that is Polkadot. Well done in getting to this point to the OT team.

4 Likes

Also supporting this - love to see the possibilities and collaborations grow <3

4 Likes

Proposal is open for voting. It is #14 and in General Admin Track.

Preimage hash is: 0x74da4ff9495412672d6b5c5a1048c207198cdacc18c82f86b6864969a4d71fb3
Batched encoded calldata: 0x1e020c6b0900fb070000e803000000900100010301000100e40b5402000000000000000000000002286bee02000400010700863ba101020008006b0901fb070000010301000100e40b5402000000000000000000000002286bee02000400010700863ba101020008001e0008690000010200ed1f040a6c4f726967696e547261696c2050617261636861696e20546f6b656e1478634f54500c000100000000000000000000000000000001690100010200ed1f040a55ebf87fac96010000000000000000001b000000

Important note: There is another proposal (#13) in Root track which is submitted by mistake, and you should not vote on it at all and let it expire.

Thanks for the support!

hey sir thanks for letting us

It would be nice if you could add the information directly on the description in Polkassembly, pls

Thenks @jose.crypto, description in Polkassembly updated

1 Like

Thanks, with this done is an AYE from me :raised_hands:

1 Like

I have a question regarding the prerequisites for the parachain’s sovereign account, specifically the requirement for locking 20 DOT as collateral.

Could you provide more information on the rationale behind this collateral requirement and how it contributes to the security and reliability of the proposed HRMP channel?

In full support of this proposal, great to see more integrations with other networks. Expanding the use of Moonbeam.

I vote Aye of this proposal