Delegation Report - blackk_magiik

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonbeam

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes–All for runtime upgrades. The team over the years has produced solid, innovative upgrades.

Date: 12/21/2024

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonriver
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonriver

https://forum.moonbeam.network/t/proposal-67-bump-xcm-safe-version-to-3/1976/22

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes–I believe its necessary to continue to upgrade the core functions of the chain. Moving to XCM v3 ensures Moonriver can continue to introduce new technology and functionality. Not sure of any caveats/downsides to v3 adoption, but I believe the pro’s outweighs the con’s.

Date: 12/28/2024

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonbeam

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes–I believe its necessary to continue to upgrade the core functions of the chain. Moving to XCM v3 ensures Moonriver can continue to introduce new technology and functionality. Not sure of any caveats/downsides to v3 adoption, but I believe the pro’s outweighs the con’s.

Date: 12/28/2024

1 Like

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonbeam

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes–Appreciate the effort to continue to keep xcvBNC alive and migrate from Moonriver to Moonbeam. Interested in how fueling Moonbeams Dex’s with xcvBNC will actually turn out. Dont have a particular reason to vote Nay on this proposal.

Date: 12/28/2024

1 Like

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonbeam

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes– As seen in MR64 for Moonriver. Shifting the Parachain Bond Reserve to the treasury is a major shift in the right direction for Moonbeam. PBR is no longer required with the new functionality of purchasing cores for parachain runtimes! More importantly shifting the PBR to the treasury, provides improved community growth. Whether its development, RPC node running or other initiatives. I am very interested in seeing how the treasury extra ~14M GLMR funds annually will contribute to the improvement of the community. Eventually we’ll vote for support in favor of RT3500 to bring 100% of the PBR to the treasury piggy banks.

Date: 1/7/25

2 Likes

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonbeam

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes– It is unfortunate a user had to become victim to an XCM transaction failure on Moonbeam network. It feels right, to give the user their funds back and cleanup. Definitely yes to this.

Date: 2/1/25

2 Likes

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonbeam/Moonriver
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonbeam/Moonriver

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes– Its rare to say No to a runtime upgrade and its not today! Looking forward to the new RT3401 improvements to the treasury spending. More importantly greatly looking forward to the new streamlined process of not requiring locked funds to submit treasury proposals. As a member of UnitedBloc, whom submits every quarter. Its a nice peace of mind :slight_smile:

Date: 2/1/25

2 Likes

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonriver
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonriver

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes–Its great to see the continued improvement to Moonriver especially the treasury! All for setting the MOVR fees to burn 100% and remove the current 20% treasury funding. No this doesnt mean the treasury lost its only source of funds but its a great step to decreasing inflationary trend.

Date: 2/10/2025

1 Like

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonbeam

https://apps.moonbeam.network/moonbeam/referendum/97
https://apps.moonbeam.network/moonbeam/referendum/98
https://apps.moonbeam.network/moonbeam/referendum/99

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes–Generally in favor of expanding Moonbeams XCM reach and further showing how Moonbeam bridges other parachains together with such ease. Great to see continued use and expansion of Moonbeams blockchain.

Date: 2/10/2025

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonriver
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonriver

https://apps.moonbeam.network/moonriver/referendum/70

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes– Its important to keep the Moonriver network healty and remove dead XCM network.
Date: 2/23/25

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonriver
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonriver

https://apps.moonbeam.network/moonriver/referendum/71

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes– In favor of the new hotfix runtime to fix few issues.
Date: 2/23/25

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonbeam

https://apps.moonbeam.network/moonbeam/referendum/100

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes– It is unfortanate Polkadex is moving towards Hyperbridge which no longer requires XCM with Moonbeam. In favor of closing the no longer needed XCM.

Date: 2/23/25

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonbeam

https://apps.moonbeam.network/moonbeam/referendum/103

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes– Fully support extending the grant program candidacy to 12 months and increasing the compensation amount. Tad bit sad to see the break away from the traditional 6 month elections, but grant programs take a significant amount of time to review, validate and onboard. A lot of time there are several moving parts that makes completing the grant within 6 months very diffucult. As to the current elected members, fully support their work. They are doing an awesome job and so extending to 12months I dont see any particular issues.

Date: 3/22/25

1 Like

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonbeam

https://apps.moonbeam.network/moonbeam/referendum/104

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes– Mo XCM, mo innvocation…right? Good to see continued used and expansion for the Moonbeam network.

Date: 3/22/25

1 Like

Delegate Name: blackk_magiik
Delegate ID: Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0x47a15e9165ee60164d0c3c84b2227989698820ad
Voting activity:

Network: Moonbeam

https://apps.moonbeam.network/moonbeam/referendum/105

Your vote: Yes

Voting Yes– Great to see the community continually adapting Moonbeam validator requirements to better match the community needs and support decentralization. While didnt agree with the inital proposal to reduce down to 100K GLMR bond, fully believe 500K is a suitable threshold to drive additional demand but maintain security and stability in the active set.

Date: 3/22/25

2 Likes