Delegation Report - turrizt

Delegate Name: Aleksandr aka turrizt
Delegate ID: Moonriver and Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0xd87f6ec59f558ae5b1a647bfd466ea51849ea203

Voting activity :point_down:

  • Network: Moonriver
  • Referendum ID: 59
  • Proposal Title: Authorize Upgrade for Moonriver to RT3100
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted in favor of this proposal as increasing the block gas limit will enhance the network’s capacity to handle more transactions per block. this upgrade will improve throughput, reduce congestion, and improve the user experience on Moonriver. this feature will be added as part of the Runtime 3100 upgrade

Date: 06.08.2024

1 Like

Delegate Name: Aleksandr aka turrizt
Delegate ID: Moonriver and Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0xd87f6ec59f558ae5b1a647bfd466ea51849ea203

Voting activity :point_down:

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 64
  • Proposal Title: Authorize Upgrade for Moonbeam to RT3100
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted in favor of this proposal as increasing the block gas limit from 15m to 30m will enhance the network’s capacity to handle more txs per block. this upgrade, part of the Runtime 3100, will improve throughput, reduce congestion, and enhance the overall user experience on Moonbeam

Date: 14.08.2024

1 Like

Delegate Name: Aleksandr aka turrizt
Delegate ID: Moonriver and Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0xd87f6ec59f558ae5b1a647bfd466ea51849ea203

Voting activity :point_down:

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 65
  • Proposal Title: Registering SnowBridge Assets WETH, WBTC, and wstETH
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted in favor, but with caution. while Snowbridge has undergone extensive audits and development, it is still relatively new and untested. despite being a trustless bridge, there are risks associated with code exploits, making bridges a complex topic. however, I believe Snowbridge will become reliable with time and further testing

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 66
  • Proposal Title: Proposal to Recover Locked Assets back to Hydration Users
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye on this proposal, which rectified an issue caused by the Moonbeam Runtime 3100. this issue led to XCM tokens being stuck during transfers. I supported this to ensure affected users are reimbursed and the problem is resolved

Date: 16.09.2024

1 Like

Delegate Name: Aleksandr aka turrizt
Delegate ID: Moonriver and Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0xd87f6ec59f558ae5b1a647bfd466ea51849ea203

Voting activity :point_down:

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 69
  • Proposal Title: Whitelist: RT3102 Upgrade
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: Voting Aye as this proposal supports crucial fixes to XCM transfer fees and gas estimation, improving transaction reliability. It also doubles the gas per block from 30m to 60m, enhancing scalability and capacity to handle more txs per block

Date: 21.09.2024

Delegate Name: Aleksandr aka turrizt
Delegate ID: Moonriver and Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0xd87f6ec59f558ae5b1a647bfd466ea51849ea203

Voting activity :point_down:

Date: 21.09.2024

1 Like

Delegate Name: Aleksandr aka turrizt
Delegate ID: Moonriver and Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0xd87f6ec59f558ae5b1a647bfd466ea51849ea203

Voting activity :point_down:

  • Network: Moonriver
  • Referendum ID: 60
  • Proposal Title: Authorize Upgrade for Moonriver to RT3200
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye because RT3200 introduces native EVM foreign assets, changes the process for managing XCM derivative assets, and enhances developer tools, benefiting dApp developers and improving overall network performance

Date: 25.09.2024

1 Like

Delegate Name: Aleksandr aka turrizt
Delegate ID: Moonriver and Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0xd87f6ec59f558ae5b1a647bfd466ea51849ea203

Voting activity :point_down:

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 70
  • Proposal Title: SORA Networks Proposal to Open/Accept HRMP channel and Register Assets
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye because the issue of incorrectly setting multiple XCM fee assets has been fixed. also, this proposal enhances Moonbeam’s cross-chain capabilities by establishing a bi-directional HRMP channel with SORA, providing access to its dApps and services. I checked their GitHub and Polkaswap dApp, and both appear active. while this isn’t an endorsement, I’m always in favor of opening more bi-directional channels with other chains



  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 71
  • Proposal Title: Authorize Upgrade of Moonbeam to RT3200
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye on Runtime Upgrade 3200 as it increases Moonbeam’s block gas limit from 30M to 60M, doubling transaction capacity. It also introduces native EVM-compatible foreign assets, improving Ethereum integration and developer tools, which enhances the network’s scalability and efficiency

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 72
  • Proposal Title: Add Sik as additional registrar
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I supported this proposal because Sik has shown a strong commitment to Moonbeam and brings valuable experience as a registrar from other networks. his hands-on approach to identity verification adds trust and reliability, giving users an alternative option for securing their on-chain identities

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 73
  • Proposal Title: Close XCM Channel with Parallel Finance
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye on this proposal because I know people with DOT stuck on Parallel, and they’ve received no help from them. closing the XCM channel is a necessary step to protect Moonbeam users from further issues given the current balance mismatch

Date: 09.10.2024

1 Like

Delegate Name: Aleksandr aka turrizt
Delegate ID: Moonriver and Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0xd87f6ec59f558ae5b1a647bfd466ea51849ea203

Voting activity :point_down:

  • Network: Moonriver
  • Referendum ID: 61
  • Proposal Title: Add Sik as additional registrar
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I recently voted Aye on a similar proposal on Moonbeam and am voting the same on Moonriver. Sik has shown strong dedication to the Moonriver network and brings valuable experience as a registrar from other chains

  • Network: Moonriver
  • Referendum ID: 62
  • Proposal Title: Move 15% of Moonriver’s Sovereign Account on Kusama to AH-Kusama
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye because this proposal enables XCM transfers of KSM between Moonriver and Kusama Asset Hub without needing to teleport KSM from the Kusama relay chain to AH. while the number of transferable assets is limited atm on Kusama AH, this is a good opportunity to test the feature on Moonriver before implementing it on Moonbeam, where there are more use cases. It’s a promising step with potential for future cross-chain interactions

Date: 11.10.2024

1 Like

Delegate Name: Aleksandr aka turrizt
Delegate ID: Moonriver and Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0xd87f6ec59f558ae5b1a647bfd466ea51849ea203

Voting activity :point_down:

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 74
  • Proposal Title: Fast Track: Closing of Parallel Finance XCM Channel
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye due to Parallel Finance’s concerning actions, including the unauthorized minting of 140K xcGLMR, a rushed system upgrade, and the intermittent offline status of its RPCs. these raise serious security concerns, making it necessary to close the XCM channel to protect Moonbeam community

Date: 14.10.2024

1 Like

Delegate Name: Aleksandr aka turrizt
Delegate ID: Moonriver and Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0xd87f6ec59f558ae5b1a647bfd466ea51849ea203

Voting activity :point_down:

Date: 24.10.2024

Delegate Name: Aleksandr aka turrizt
Delegate ID: Moonriver and Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0xd87f6ec59f558ae5b1a647bfd466ea51849ea203

Voting activity :point_down:

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 75
  • Proposal Title: Proposal Close HRMP channel with Composable Finance
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye because Composable Finance hasn’t consistently produced blocks. closing the XCM channel now safeguards the Moonbeam community from sudden disruptions. we can reopen it quickly if they stabilize

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 77
  • Proposal Title: Move 15% of Moonbeam’s Sovereign Account on Polkadot to AH-Polkadot
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye on this proposal, similar to my vote on Moonriver. this proposal facilitates seamless DOT and xcDOT transfers between Moonbeam and Polkadot AH without routing through the Polkadot relay chain. ensuring liquidity in Moonbeam’s Sovereign Account on Polkadot AH is essential to support xcDOT withdrawals

Date: 25.10.2024