[Proposal:MR27/MB31] Delegate dashboards for Moonbeam, Moonriver and Moonbase

[Aleksandr]

thank you for the detailed response. I just want to clarify that my questions aim to understand the scope of work and the associated costs totaling $29k, as the proposal lacks detail in this area. please don’t take this personally, I am advocating for transparency. It’s important that the community has access to this discussion and can review all aspects when needed

---

@mmurthy

The only one in the recent memory was an issues from a month or so ago when a token holder couldn’t undelegate their tokens for some reason. It took a lot of back and forth to track it down. My dev even hopped on a call and screenshared with the user to solve this problem. Hope that gives an idea.

I recall this issue and remember directing the user to the Karma devs as per your request, especially after our initial attempt to resolve it proved unsuccessful. I suspect there was a misconfiguration on Karma’s side, as I couldn’t identify any triggers for the issue within the Moonbeam framework. could you please clarify where the misconfiguration occurred that prevented the user from undelegate his funds? I believe it’s somewhat unfair for the Moonbeam treasury to bear the costs for issues originating on Karma’s end. but, I’d appreciate your thoughts on this matter

---

@mmurthy

Another example: We found out very recently that when tokens are locked with conviction, you can’t just withdraw after that lock time. The timer starts after the token unlock trigger happens. We had to figure out all the implications in our code and make changes.

i believe I pointed out and explained this issue in detail quite some time ago in our joint tg group, indicating that this is how it works. could you clarify what you mean by discovering this “very recently” - I’m a bit confused by the timeline here. could you please share more insights?

---

@mmurthy

One more example: Delegates link their forum handle to their profile by signing and posting on the forum. Sometimes they sign with one wallet and try to link another, signatures don’t match and it fails and they message us. We have to help them in such cases.

regarding this issue, many users have DMed me about it. the solution is quite simple, I just delete their erroneous message from the forum, allowing them to link the correct address. I don’t believe users need to reach out to karma for this issue, instead, they report it directly to us and we resolve it promptly

---

@mmurthy

Most of the codebase is shared across all of them to make it easy to maintain. There are always some differences. All of the dashboards use same hosting providers and third party services and libraries. There was no science behind the split. Because the funds will come from two different treasuries, I thought that’s how it should be split. I am fine combining them or splitting in a different way.

considering that the dashboards for Moonriver / Moonbase and Moonbeam share a significant portion of their codebase and infra, I’m curious about the justification for the high funding requests for both, especially $20k for Moonriver / Moonbase. could you provide a detailed breakdown of the specific costs that lead to these amounts?

---

btw, i noticed that the new logo has been updated for Moonbeam but not yet for Moonriver. it would be great to update the Moonriver logo as well. here’s the brand kit link for your reference: Moonbeam Brand Guidelines