Hi @Jim_CertHum , thanks for making yourself available; I already shared the UB Telegram link to our DevOps team; if we need any extra info we will let you know by there!
[Proposal: MB12/MR9] Moonbeam Multisig support and optimization for Moonbeam, Moonriver and Moonbase
2 Likes
Ah, nice! Glad to hear it!
ok then let’s hope all is well, keep us informed sir 
the idea of aroon is good too
Hi Team!
Quick update: UnitedBlock team did a small fix and we successfully tested it with Moonbase on the Staging environment. As soon as the fix is deployed on Moonbeam and Moonriver we will update the Staging environment for respectively these networks.
Next step will be setting up the Production environment.
cc: @aaron.mbf , @jose.crypto , @Daniel_TrueStaking , @Jim_CertHum , @AlbertoV19
4 Likes
Thanks for the update sir
1 Like
Thanks for the update @esantos089.
Curious to know what fix needed to be done? @Jim_CertHum @Daniel_TrueStaking
Hi @AlbertoV19 – the fix was in the latest client release (0.31.1) so just an upgrade.
2 Likes
Ahh good to hear, it probably was this pr. Tracing images (which they were running) actually did not show this bug, but public RPCs running regular images did.
Thanks for the clarification! Let us know how the test trial goes.
1 Like
Hi Guys,
We are using UnitedBloc RPCs on our Staging environment and so far all is good. To the next days, we will plan the Production update 
6 Likes
Hi Team, just a quick update:
The proposal content is already updated considering our latest decisions (integrating with Unitedbloc Moonbeam RPC);
The rollout for the Production environment will be done in the 2nd part of this Month (May), the Staging environment is already set up, and running. 
cc: @AlbertoV19 , @Jim_CertHum , @jose.crypto , @Daniel_TrueStaking
4 Likes
I’m glad to know that everything went well regarding the use of UB
now to continue with the proposal, in this case we recommend using a rate of 80% in GLMR and 20% in MOVR, and we would like you to use the 30d average price
You must also do the conversion and add the amounts in tokens in the main post
@esantos089 is ok this for you?
Hey @jose.crypto,
I need to update the last line on Overall Cost section:
From:
Total cost: USD 45,600 equivalent in GLMR (equals a monthly cost of $7,6k).
To:
Total cost: 45,500 USD (equals a monthly cost of $7,6k) equivalent to 80/20 respectively in GLMR and MOVR.
The conversion rate will be set as the 30-day twap (time-weighted average price).
As I have no right for editing the proposal content, can you, kindly, help me?
Cheers!
Hey, Eduardo, if you try it again?
Hey @esantos089 , already turrizt look it, can you tell us if work?
All good now!
Thanks @turrizt and @jose.crypto !
1 Like
When the proposal is live on chain, remember add the links there too
1 Like
great!
do you have any instructions about moving to the Phase 4: Treasury Council Review and Vote?
Have a great week!
Hey @esantos089, since there are currently 3 comments of support from the Treasury Councilors, you should put the proposal on chain, with the corresponding ratio ( 80% GLMR/ 20% MOVR)
and use the last 30d price average, once both proposals are on chain, post the links here
The steps for create the proposal on chain are using Polkadot.js:
Go to Governance > Treasury
Click “Submit Proposal”:
-Select the account that’s submitting the proposal, the beneficiary and the treasury proposal value (which represents the number of tokens that will be granted to the beneficiary if the proposal motion is passed). Note that the proposal bond is 5% of the requested value, with a set minimum of 100 GLMR for Moonbeam.
-Click “Submit Proposal”
-On the next screen, sign the transaction
-The proposal is now created, in this example with the proposal index 0.
if you have any doubt can ask here
Hey sir, have you doubts with this @esantos089 ?
Hey @jose.crypto , thanks for all this detailed instruction!
We are planning to set it up in the begin of next week.
Again, thank you for all the help you provided!
1 Like