Delegation Report - turrizt

Delegate Name: Aleksandr aka turrizt
Delegate ID: Moonriver and Moonbeam
Delegation Address: 0xd87f6ec59f558ae5b1a647bfd466ea51849ea203

Voting activity :point_down:

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 109
  • Proposal Title: Proposal for migrating all substrate based assets to EVM foreign assets on Moonbeam
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye because migrating XC-20 foreign assets to native EVM format will improve compatibility and reliability on Moonbeam. the current pre-compile model causes issues with Ethereum tooling, and this is the right first step to move these assets to a better and more future-proof format

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 110
  • Proposal Title: Whitelisted Authorize Upgrade to RT3601 on Moonbeam
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye because RT3601 fixes a critical issue in RT3600 on Moonbeam. the technical committee has approved this version, and it makes sense to move forward with the corrected upgrade

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 111
  • Proposal Title: Erroneous Proposal, please vote NAY
  • Vote: Nay
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Nay because this proposal is being replaced by a corrected version (#114) so there’s no reason to proceed with it

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 112
  • Proposal Title: Erroneous Proposal, please vote NAY
  • Vote: Nay
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Nay because this is the same issue as Proposal 111. It is being replaced by the corrected Proposal #114, so this version should not move forward

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 113
  • Proposal Title: Authorize Upgrade for Moonbeam to RT3701
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye because RT3701 adds important safety improvements, including automatic fallback to maintenance mode if migrations fail. It also brings upstream fixes. this is a safe and necessary upgrade to move forward with on Moonbeam

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 114
  • Proposal Title: Transitioning the Moonbeam Treasury to Stablecoin Payments
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye because using stablecoins for certain Treasury payments will help reduce GLMR volatility risk and improve budget predictability. the proposal includes safeguards and starts with a small portion of inflows, which makes sense as a first step

  • Network: Moonbeam
  • Referendum ID: 115
  • Proposal Title: Cancel Referenda #111 and #112
  • Vote: Aye
  • Reason for the Vote: I voted Aye because this proposal correctly cancels Referenda #111 and #112, which were replaced by the corrected Proposal #114. This helps avoid confusion and keeps the process clean